Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:39
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How is TikTok able to censor porn?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What do you think about Matt Gatz as an attorney general?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is it ok to be spanked by your parents if you are not in bed in your set bedtime?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump Weighs In On Possible Sean 'Diddy' Combs Pardon: 'He Used To Really Like Me' - HuffPost
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Will Kamala Harris rekindle the business model of sleeping your way to the top?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The European Central Bank is almost guaranteed to cut rates. Here's what could happen next - CNBC
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.